@batman333 (View Post)

No.

Too hard.

(Excuse me for the rudeness, but this has been rejected mutiple times)

@batman333 (View Post)

Xetalim is right, but a bit brusque. This idea has been suggested many times before, and it is completely understandable. The only problem is the fact that most of TPT would be messed up by this. Most saves would be broken.

The only positive thing I can see from this is that it would form celestial body-like formations when gravity is turned off. This can already be done placing GPMP, turning on Newtonian Gravity, and setting the temp to how much gravity you want.

One arguement you may want to make is the fact that it can be made into an option, like Water Equalization or Newtonian Gravity. The fact is, 50-75% of those options are, for the most part, useless. Sorry, but this would only serve to clutter.

If you are suggesting this to make TPT more realistic, well the game is called The Powder Toy. Not The Realistic Powder Toy. Ideas based around realism don't make it anymore, if they ever did at all.

@KydonShadow (View Post)

 i am only disapointing with th final part

 The powder toy is 99.999^(100^100)% realistic maybe from what i see

 the name doesn't matter if it is realistic powder toy or the powder toy

 making the game more realistic makes the game more important and fun

 if really tpt is 100% realistic then all scientists will use it making it more important to use

its a toy not a serious science tool.  there are real world applications which scientists already use.  powder toy is a pittance to specialized SCIENCE tools.   and no, I am sorry, but powder toy is maybe 10% realistic at best.

@Sandwichlizard (View Post)

@Lockheedmartin (View Post)

you have a point i know that just compare between the positive and negative side

light travels slow there is no nature pressure melt points are not the same as in real life diamond is unbreakable there is no walls in real life etc

so after my researches TPT is not 10% it is more than 50% and less than 70% without the graphics if you want to count graphics then it is more than 5% and less than 15% if you have any other idea then i want to see it :)

Chemistry. Don't try. I tried. It didn't work.

@Lockheedmartin (View Post)

 take a paper then divide it to two columns one is for positive side and one for negative side the write the positive sides and negative sides then decide how much useful/realistic it is maybe you will get lower or higher