@lillepallt(View Post) I agree, ranking members only based on their saves isn't good, because alot of us don't really make saves. Lockheedmartin made a reputation algorythm a while ago, we could use that to determine the ranks.
Yeah maybe there should be forum ranks too like a posts are 1pt and topics are 5 pts. Help topics maybe could be -1 pt and 3 pts awarded for help posts. I am not really sure about forum ranks so if anyone else is interested in making them then they can :D
Lynxrufus, Ok I understand what you mean maybe not average then but u can't have noobs who make loads of saves just 2 rank up and use all elements? It should be master all elements. Only if there was a test. Base it on how much a save gets not how many saves are made. What about how many saves you make with 20+ votes then you can have as many other saves as you can without effecting you're rank. And that's unfair on peeps like me, who doesn't make much saves but instead spends lots of time on big saves that try to top the fp. I has to be fair. I will probably change the ranks according to what other peeps think maybe later :)