-
Started 8th Jul 2011 in General
@TheTempest ...sadly. Also, proofreading is very important. Tell the main editor that I told that. He could believe you then xD
-
Started 8th Jul 2011 in General
@TPT-Times boxmein
-
Started 8th Jul 2011 in Feedback
@ozone (View Post) That's a cool idea but then think about sparks travelling over a single particle. It will skip over the particle in a tick. Plus, the rotation problem is still at hand. ...
-
Started 8th Jul 2011 in General
@ief015 True. @Ace Also very true. Nothing shall make me spam images into all threads! And, get to use this code: <a href="https://powdertoy.co.uk/Discussions/T...
-
Started 8th Jul 2011 in Feedback
@Vou Stop spamming. @chris1234 Use the Wiki's "previously requested elements" topic. Also, all new elements are rejected unless a few that add serious improvement to the game. &n...
-
Started 8th Jul 2011 in Feedback
@nmd It'll make particles moving due to velocity freak.
-
Started 8th Jul 2011 in General
That's a good idea. But the fave managing would require each element's location being a variable.
-
Started 8th Jul 2011 in Feedback
@code1949 It's an expression And, I like this. Very much. Now pin it or something :)
-
Started 8th Jul 2011 in Feedback
@OP Well here are a few: Slime,If by a bridge you mean keep them together then Rejected. PROOF https://powdertoy.co.uk/Wiki.html?id=previously_requested_elements#movable_solids Zombi...
-
Started 8th Jul 2011 in General
The closest powder was EQVE. CNCT is just a powder that allows for one-thick towers. Try doing that with dust. @Finalflash50 What.Edited by boxmein, 2011-07-06 20:04:10