-
Started 31st Mar 2011 in Feedback
Somebody make it a mod XD. I am interested in seeing if this would cause great lag, or if it would not affect the speed of PT. It seems like it should not, as the calculations are ...
-
Started 31st Mar 2011 in Feedback
Ummm....... You understand that if this second layer will only interact with the first layer via electricity. Any particles in the primary layer can not "fall" into the electronics layer. I...
-
Started 31st Mar 2011 in Feedback
@randalserrano What? In the electronics layer, anything that conducts electricity will work normally. While it would be possible to put other particles in this layer, the si...
-
Started 31st Mar 2011 in Feedback
@snowfire777 Connecting wires is just one use. It would also be used for more logic gates and systems. But yes, wifi is a good method to connect point A to point B.
-
Started 31st Mar 2011 in Feedback
Supporters =D. If you guys do notice, I already noted that two new elements (one particle and one wall) would be needed to transfer the spark. It would do so by sending a spark to the other layer at ...
-
Started 31st Mar 2011 in Feedback
@TheCeilingCat All out 3D has been rejected. The GUI bit was actually suggested a while back, and got positive feedback. The main reason 3D was rejected was lag and the coding requ...
-
Started 31st Mar 2011 in Feedback
This is a run off of a "3D" Powder Toy, but modified in such a way so that it could be possible. This idea will add two "layers" to PT. The first layer w...
-
Started 30th Mar 2011 in Feedback
@andrewdavidloftus Would make slower. Before anything of this nature can happen, PT has to support multi cores and GPUs.
-
Started 30th Mar 2011 in General
Erm... I think there are like 3 or 4 "bomb" clubs already....
-
Started 30th Mar 2011 in General
Another club?...... Why? Pretty soon PT will closely resemble the US government....