-
Started 5th Jul 2013 in General
That site is ok but the oldest version displayed there isn't the oldest released or as old as the one I still have.
-
Started 5th Jul 2013 in Feedback
It's actualy not that hard to do with current features.
See save id:1116599
-
Started 4th Jul 2013 in Creations
I'm glad this threads still running :P
________________________________________________________________________________________
1248616View Save 1248616
A fully automatic forg...
-
Started 3rd Jul 2013 in Feedback
@Catelite (View Post)
Looping it in with coal is a good idea to be honest, although adding a new element would protect saves from being broken.
If adding a whole new level to check for just a f...
-
Started 2nd Jul 2013 in Feedback
@xetalim (View Post)
It has, but most of the suggestions were just for an element with an intermetiate strengh and maybe with a few gimmicks like blocking pressure. @lorddeath (View Post)
Glad ...
-
Started 2nd Jul 2013 in Feedback
@xetalim (View Post)
Didn't we just get Catelite's approval?
@Plutonium84 (View Post)
As long as the program is written correctly the equation will always work.
-
Started 1st Jul 2013 in General
It would be better if you explained without include the phase "ban you" in the comment. When I first found the forms I necro'd a few threads before I learnt the curiosity .
-
Started 1st Jul 2013 in Feedback
@Michael238 (View Post)
Ill add that putting it into iron would create METL.
@Plutonium84 (View Post)
Good. I actually have the equation for the increase in ultimate tensile strength with th...
-
Started 30th Jun 2013 in Feedback
Sorry but the cooling of moltern elements would break existing saves. A significant proportion in fact.
Stickman on glass I think we could live with though.
-
Started 30th Jun 2013 in Feedback
@Plutonium84 (View Post)
@EqualsThree (View Post)
These are good ideas I think, but the radius may defeat the purpose. Carbon is meant to simulate alloy with elements. Unless you mean that 1 p...