Comments

klaotte003 2nd June

then we follow a SLS like approach, 2 solid boosters attached to first stage that is hydrolox
KyleTheCreator 2nd June

so ecological impact is NOT the biggest of our worries
KyleTheCreator 2nd June

in any way were also in like. a pretty bad world, too. theres a ton of wars. a ton of viruses [like MAV] and a magma virus?? also a lot of missiles and also aether missiles [which are magic or something?!]
KyleTheCreator 2nd June

I've been trying to make prototypes of nuclear engines [Solaris hygn engine] and some other engines [Solaris engine] trying to see how to make alot of thrust
klaotte003 2nd June

the only question is, what is the ecological situation? if its bad, then we have to abandon solid boosters because they are horrendous for the ozone layer that shields a planet from radiation
klaotte003 2nd June

if we make a carrier rocket with 2 big solid boosters and the first stage being powered by hydrolox we could get to orbit in just 1.5 stages really easy
klaotte003 2nd June

apollo missions flew using the service module+lander module, and turned around the service module to take the lander payload out of the third stage
klaotte003 2nd June

so basically i was thinking of the plan
KyleTheCreator 1st June

welcome inside your a calculator
klaotte003 1st June

I'll join

The Powder Toy