Mad_Noob
Mad_Noob
67 / 10
29th Jul 2019
31st Jul 2019
Smaller than hioo- unicellular's.
small reactor mavrik milireactor pixelreactor

Comments

  • Ritorian
    Ritorian
    30th Jul 2019
    you need to encase it in anything for it to be a 1x1, though. A powder reactor can't be smaller than 2px
  • Ritorian
    Ritorian
    30th Jul 2019
    that means i won?
  • Ritorian
    Ritorian
    30th Jul 2019
    Still means thats a 1x1.
  • Scien_Tific
    Scien_Tific
    30th Jul 2019
    @Ritorian I don't agree with the counting particles statement. The goal is to make the smallest reactor -in size, so determining the size of the reactor should be done by counting pixels.
  • Ritorian
    Ritorian
    30th Jul 2019
    I assume i'm the king of reactors now. :D
  • Ritorian
    Ritorian
    30th Jul 2019
    so if we don't count the casing as reactor part, Unicellular statement about unstable reactor is false.
  • Ritorian
    Ritorian
    30th Jul 2019
    Thing is. My reactor, if encased within a solid block still produces energy.
  • Ritorian
    Ritorian
    30th Jul 2019
    There are two points of view: 1: 1px reactor can't exist if the fuel required is polonium or uranium. That means a 1px reactor should be actually 1px after unpause. 2: Pixels are only counted in the stamp of the reactor (etc if it releases 1 pixel of fuel it still counts as 1px)
  • Ritorian
    Ritorian
    30th Jul 2019
    2447952 Beat this monster
  • Ritorian
    Ritorian
    30th Jul 2019
    Now ya people go for layered and i will count particles. Not pixels. Particles.