ARDOer
ARDOer
168 / 14
12th Apr 2018
25th May 2019
That bunker can able to withstand the explosion of deut(life=999999999999) bomb. It completely destroyable but this is too difficult to achive. I dont use unbreakable material because its not interesting
bunker nuclear stable bomb deut destroyable realistic nuke powerful destroy

Comments

  • Paulo_fofis
    Paulo_fofis
    13th Apr 2018
    thunder destroyed this bunquer
  • schuylerwalker
    schuylerwalker
    13th Apr 2018
    trick shot w/prot laser and it self destructs. pretty good otherwise
  • Defined-User
    Defined-User
    13th Apr 2018
    my deut life=(99999999999999) bomb obliterate d it the first time this is not a bunker like the description said it is..
  • Klazuthed
    Klazuthed
    13th Apr 2018
    one shot too easy m8
  • Klazuthed
    Klazuthed
    13th Apr 2018
    one shot too easy m8
  • tornados
    tornados
    13th Apr 2018
    Day, how could an arch of material possibly be cheaper than a straight line? Geometry dictates that an arch shape is longer in total distance than a straight line, so the arches would have to cost more, as there is more material that would have to be built.
  • supertnt6
    supertnt6
    13th Apr 2018
    @dayday24 NEEERRRRDD!
  • ddli777
    ddli777
    12th Apr 2018
    SING bomb burns everything, not testing azure but cool +1
  • dayday24
    dayday24
    12th Apr 2018
    This bunker is very poorly contructed, what a waste of resources to have to reinforce the cieling with a flat roof! That Flat roof is bluntly taking all the weight of the rock above it, which makes it much more vulnerable to concussive impact. When making any directly load bearing roof, always make it an arch, so the downwards force is ditributed outwards in a more manageable way; Making the structure stronger, cheaper and more spacious.
  • Seyten
    Seyten
    12th Apr 2018
    The bunker itself is not stable at all