The Powder Toy

VRSG is not an Efficient Fuel by SlazZer

SlazZer
SlazZer
30 / 16
23rd Jan 2017
23rd Jan 2017
No Description provided.
wellthatnailedit badexamples wrong waterburnsbetter vrsgisafuel badnot truesave downwithvrsg

Comments

  • TheNik
    TheNik     23rd Jan 2017
    In fact, it's the least important thing once you're in orbit. There are rockets that thrust for weeks and only get a few m/s faster. The real important thing is how much thrust you get for how much fuel - e.g. a kilogram of this fuel may accelerate you by 1 m/s but a kilogram of that fuel may accelerate you by 2 m/s. So the second fuel is better.
  • TheNik
    TheNik     23rd Jan 2017
    Efficiency is an interesting thing. There is more than one kind of efficiency - you just showed the TWR or ISP for rocket drives, which is very hard to tell anyway, and the energy efficiency, however you try to negate it with the rentability showing that the fuel is hard to handle. Indeed, it is, but I only showed how VRSG stores more energy per particle than COAL does. Which still remains true. As for the rocket drives... High thrust is not the most important thing in them.
  • matthiasguy1
    matthiasguy1     23rd Jan 2017
    it's still more efficient
  • Darkspawn
    Darkspawn     23rd Jan 2017
    who needs a vrsg fuel if its only a bit better then coal, but more dangerous? just use coal kid, stuff dies less with it
  • kubolo
    kubolo     23rd Jan 2017
    you can put it only on diamond and it is eating void and clone
  • kubolo
    kubolo     23rd Jan 2017
    com20027. virus gas is eating pump. but you an use airwall
  • Bossatronn
    Bossatronn     23rd Jan 2017
    makes cool bombs though
  • Zezombye
    Zezombye     23rd Jan 2017
    Yes. VRSG is not an cool fuel because you can place coal in anything, but virus can be placed ONLY in diamond.
  • com20027
    com20027     23rd Jan 2017
    how about using pump to make rocket with vrsg?
  • JamzsMc
    JamzsMc     23rd Jan 2017
    interesting