TheNik
22nd Jan 2017
22nd Jan 2017
The VRSG fuel lasts as long as COAL, but burns > 59% hotter, meaning it generates that much more energy, and thus making it that much more efficient than COAL. The only major drawback is that handling VRSG is extremely difficult and dangerous. Enjoy!
fire
efficient
science
fuel
efficiency
comparison
virus
coal
burn
compare
Comments
-
man you created a meme on TPT! I don't believe this is going to be very known upon the TPT community, but if it does, cheers, you'll be known for creating the "VRSG is an Efficient Fuel!" id:2094666
-
forgot i had command in to destroy diamond and destroy coal faster and the whole thing was gone within 5-10 seconds ;p
-
Bonus points if someone manages to build a reactor powreed by VRSG from mostly destructible particles. (E.g. some DTEC won't harm, but not all from DMND, you get the point.)
-
jf55: This was posted here once before, also please check the comments in the save you linked. There's a clear explanation why the arguments are invalid, at least in this case.
-
22minnis22: As the whole point of this save is the idea, and it was already posted before, some might claim the idea theirs, and be right about it. I prefer to get that straight before it even has a chance of becoming a conflict, if possible. But thanks for the support!
-
the truth id:2094231
-
@TheNik, You don't have to take it down unless it is an exact copy. If an idea could only be posted once, there would be a lot less saves on TPT!
-
manhong2112: I see, that proves your claim. Again, if you wish, I may either make this save private or take it down at all.
-
SlazZer: I never claimed it to be either easy to handle or have a high specific impulse in certain rocket drives - the latter of which still can't be found out definitely, as the specific impulse is a very... well, specific number.
-
eden1115: I am not sure what you mean, but if I understood correctly, then you just described the problem I already mentioned in the description.