motaywo
motaywo
58 / 4
8th Oct 2016
5th Mar 2017
Instead of the rather 'fragile' conv method for subframe devices, this mechanism uses the fact that batteries spark every frame - in short, it can be rotated, flipped, and is unaffected by particle order.
electronics subframe pstn 1frame featured electronicstech experimentaltech

Comments

  • motaywo
    motaywo
    9th Oct 2016
    update: I've upgraded the 'laser' to a slightly different design, but I've left the mechanics unchanged
  • docRoboRobert
    docRoboRobert
    9th Oct 2016
    Nice. 1+ That's a cool idea.
  • ApertureScientist
    ApertureScientist
    9th Oct 2016
    Oh, Right It's The Logo. Sorry, Nevermind Me
  • ApertureScientist
    ApertureScientist
    9th Oct 2016
    It's Not Conv Free Type In Console (!set type conv none ) And You will Have Answer 4
  • motaywo
    motaywo
    9th Oct 2016
    I'm getting lots of feedback that this isn't really subframe, and that might be right. However, when it comes to influencing elements like cray or bray, the speeds are exactly the same. In the future, I might rename this tech "biframe spark", what do you guys think?
  • Schmolendevice
    Schmolendevice
    9th Oct 2016
    @motaywo I was hoping to eventually start up some tutorial videos but am presently dealing with uni. :) Otherwise, I can be blamed for my laziness regarding documentation. Maybe force out a little tutorial vid before midterm week? And do note that CONV allows for 60 Hz, not 30 Hz operation. I did explore 30 Hz computation in id:1703470. And so far, BTRY is beginning to become "obsolete" compared to CONV(SPRK) and CRAY(SPRK). :)
  • Schmolendevice
    Schmolendevice
    9th Oct 2016
    @motaywo Indeed, strictly speaking, anything that does _not_ blow up when its particle ID ordering is messed up _cannot_ be referred to as "subframe" at all. But it is indeed a "solid spark contraption/generator" nonetheless. Circumventing the reality of subframe operations does not teach the community about "subframe" at all. What we really need is to set up the informational resources to explain these topics more effectively.
  • Schmolendevice
    Schmolendevice
    9th Oct 2016
    @motaywo There was a save on FP some time ago of a much bulkier solid spark implementation using offset battery. Thing is, such devices even if rotatable simply cannot be used in computing applications. I'd argue that avoiding CONV to achieve solid spark defeats the purpose. When fully understood, CONV's behaviour can be extremely predictable and it comes to feel a lot like "programming."
  • dyaomaster
    dyaomaster
    9th Oct 2016
    @Bloxxzer For more details on subframe, see id:2028385. Not made by me, but it's an awesome description.
  • Bloxxzer
    Bloxxzer
    9th Oct 2016
    Let me ask this, because i've been wondering for a long time. WHAT IS SUBFRAME?