...and I do not plan to change anything in my machine, unless something breaks or if it is for the sake of energy saving. Also, I guess it is not possible to remove comments...
@groudon: a 3-year old computer is a fairly new one. As someone who lives in a third-world country, it is not uncommon to see people who have Pentium III or Celeron machines running Windows XP. Many of my friend do, and they use TPT. I built my computer mostly with new parts 4 years ago, and it works pretty fine. Some parts, like HDD and LCD screen are more than 7 years old. I "underclocked" it to save energy, but it's possible to get TPT running @100FPS sometimes.
Annnnddd doublepost... Can someone removes the second post please?
@Mur, you can increce the timescale at which the game runs at based on how much stuff is hapening. If i make a small electronic (32x32 in size) i can pull a full 200 FPS with a basic 3 year old commercial grade computer.
@Mur, you can increce the timescale at which the game runs at based on how much stuff is hapening. If i make a small electronic (32x32 in size) i can pull a full 200 FPS with a basic 3 year old commercial grade computer.
It looks like penis... +1 :D
Ahhh Mur woke up from a big coma of TPT saving.
@ErgOnWire I don't fully see how normal electronics would be any smaller or faster than subframe applications with FILT. And I already have my methods for arbitrary directionality of solid spark. Here I've compiled my adder, counter and memory technology; id:1778279. And this is what I've done towards high speed high res displays: 1719115. Yes it's big but at least it might be able to achieve 1 or 2 fps updates.
make a filt one, entire screen of filt can store around 6.7MB (you can even use different tmp2)
Yay! CRAY memory! The good old days :D