Since nobody reads these things, just look at the explanation in the actual simulation. And please POLITELY correct me if I'm wrong, okay. I'm only 12 years old.
aaaaaaaaaaahhhhh
forsciense
imscienstist
realistictpt
speedoflight
phot
stne
logic
timetravel
press7please
Comments
-
oh, by the way, to anybody wondering why i hold these beliefs so firmly, i am a a supporter of particle theory. i don't see how wave theory is aplicable to physical existance outside theory, a wave cannot exist unles there is something to create it. i believe photons are particles, vibrating as they move in a line: creating the illusion of a wave. also, don't even mention string theory. :b it's almost as believable as phlostagen theory.
-
never mind it did worked but now it don't
-
wow every time i click submit there is a new comment
-
sorry for spam
-
ID:1603624
-
refresh
-
refresh
-
@Miauw i don't think you understand the concept of a theory. first you state your opinion, then you attempt to rationalise it by changing the theory to meet facts, not facts to meet theories. please explain your point if you want anybody to give you a second glance. "photons wouldn't be able to travel at c if they had any mass" ok.. WHY not? i stated why i thought they had mass. why don't you state why you think they don't?
-
STNE falls faster because it has mass applied to it, in TPT photons have that speed that photons go because if they traveled at the speed of light, you wouldn`t be able to tell if their actually there. Photons do not have mass, it`s a glowing type of frequent energy. +1 on the simulation, though
-
That was to ArkaM's first comment.