Atomic10
Atomic10
122 / 41
13th Aug 2014
13th Sep 2014
Since nobody reads these things, just look at the explanation in the actual simulation. And please POLITELY correct me if I'm wrong, okay. I'm only 12 years old.
aaaaaaaaaaahhhhh forsciense imscienstist realistictpt speedoflight phot stne logic timetravel press7please

Comments

  • Atomic10
    Atomic10
    13th Aug 2014
    sentinal-5: Like the Law Of Conservation Of Mass, Energy, And Angular Momentum.
  • kyledudey
    kyledudey
    13th Aug 2014
    sentinal-5 i meant black holes r wormholes with no teleportation
  • kyledudey
    kyledudey
    13th Aug 2014
    the yoyo is one...-_-
  • sentinal-5
    sentinal-5
    13th Aug 2014
    @johnnycash227 i was debunking it, not confirming it. @kyledudey space is an isolated system. the sum of its energy will always be the same. black holes meerly alter the density of the energy.
  • Atomic10
    Atomic10
    13th Aug 2014
    REALLY!?!?!?!?!?! Tell me about it!
  • kyledudey
    kyledudey
    13th Aug 2014
    already made atomic10
  • Atomic10
    Atomic10
    13th Aug 2014
    sentinal-5: Possible perpetual-motion machine?
  • kyledudey
    kyledudey
    13th Aug 2014
    space is a singularity, think bout wut black holes do
  • johnnycash227
    johnnycash227
    13th Aug 2014
    @tothemeyers Not at all. As soon as a particle touchs a wormhole, it will be destabilized and become only energy. then what comes out the nonexsistent end is nothing. Now quit all the Star WArs and Star Trek science people or scoot.
  • sentinal-5
    sentinal-5
    13th Aug 2014
    acclubiere (warp) drives are a beautiful theory. but would require a white hole.. :b "surfing" spacetime is much more plausible. even though it still requires pushing a black hole in front of a craft.