Atomic10
Atomic10
122 / 41
13th Aug 2014
13th Sep 2014
Since nobody reads these things, just look at the explanation in the actual simulation. And please POLITELY correct me if I'm wrong, okay. I'm only 12 years old.
aaaaaaaaaaahhhhh forsciense imscienstist realistictpt speedoflight phot stne logic timetravel press7please

Comments

  • deadly-sandbox
    deadly-sandbox
    13th Aug 2014
    this twelve year old is going places
  • tothemyers
    tothemyers
    13th Aug 2014
    In a perfect frictionless vacuum, perpetual motion machines would work. Something could keep spinning for ages and since it isn't losing energy to anything, it'd just keep going. Please note that physicists do not like perfect frictionless vacuums though. I put a physicist in one once and he slipped, fell, then nearly suffocated.
  • roflcoptertrolling
    roflcoptertrolling
    13th Aug 2014
    Sentinal-5, one must understand physisc to fully comprehend it's beauty (or badassery)
  • roflcoptertrolling
    roflcoptertrolling
    13th Aug 2014
    by the way, sentinal-5 a prepetual motion machine is alot like a yoyo, in fact prepetual motion machines do indeed require an input (energy) for them to start, say a penjelum, you need to lift, then drop the ball, think of it as an
  • roflcoptertrolling
    roflcoptertrolling
    13th Aug 2014
    equation, 100=100 it's the same, but because in a real world there is friction and drag, the equation is imperfect and the energy input is reduced every time the machine moves 100-1=99 99-1=98 and so on, a prepetual motion machine just has a really low coeficcient (or zero if it was perfect) so your yoyo could swing forever.
  • sentinal-5
    sentinal-5
    13th Aug 2014
    ok. let's all agree. physics is badass.
  • roflcoptertrolling
    roflcoptertrolling
    13th Aug 2014
    hey dude, I'm 14 so don't pick on me either, but your explination for the stone being "time travelling" is incorrect, your explination for the stone traveling so quickly that time seems to slow down is correct, but in theory if
  • roflcoptertrolling
    roflcoptertrolling
    13th Aug 2014
    the stone is traveling very close to the speed of light it vould only SEEM like time is slowing down to the stone, due to the theory of relativity at such high speeds the viewer (if he could) see both the photon and stine, he would still see that the light travels faster than the stone, the same phenomanon occurs in
  • roflcoptertrolling
    roflcoptertrolling
    13th Aug 2014
    the large hadron collider in where subatomic partivles are accelerated to over 99.99% of the speed of light experince the slowing of time, so while it takes about 20 minutes for the scientists to speed up the protons, it takes only seems to be a few minutes to speed up from the prespective of the particles, (pharaphrased from a book) but in any case time travel does not occur. Please, no grammar nazis, TPDT has no autocorrect.
  • kyledudey
    kyledudey
    13th Aug 2014
    hi skzfgh';