if anybody tried to tell me weightless objects fall i swear i will hunt you down and personally drop apples on your head until you either die of brain damage or realise you need weight to fall.
if an object has no mass, it is not affected by gravity.
ok. think of it in a reletivistic way. from the planets point of view, it is stationary. the photon is whizzing past at the speed of light and falling towards it, atracted by its gravity. from the photons point of view, IT is stationary, the whole universe is whizzing past at the speed of light, and the planet is falling towards the photon. gravity is not a singular force such as a vaccum. but is more like magnetism: it must have two poles for either to feel an effect.
@ Asthepanda3 photons have no mass (mass is exactly 0) and are attracted by gravity, so m = g is wrong and correct would be e = g (E is energy and G is gravity)
the CNCT,SALT,SAND,BGLA,BRMT Do the same thing, anyway, +1
@asthepanda3 Um, that makes no sense.. And it has nothing to do with this. Electrons aren't "energy particles", they have mass. That's why they, and atoms themselves, can't reach the speed of light. Photons are pure energy, however, and have no mass. So they can reach these speeds. Theoretically, if matter moved faster than c, time would move backwards relative to the matter. Hence "time-traveling STNE".
it's great that teenagers get interested in physics and simulation, not those COD.
Thats just TPT physics ftw.
ah, nice. and haha yeah, i'm more into relativistic speed mechanics.
that was a little..err.. hard to follow shall i say...