@tothemyers you did. u said im a troll. i type like that because i think its funny,k? And (Com...poo...ter) makes u and me sound inmature, u can have internet on win 3.0 but i transfered tpt from mah sissys compooter,K? I dont like commercials and advertisemens becus there annoying,so im stuck with win 3.0, maybe iamweird, maybe iamoldschool, but i like it the way it is, so stop messing with my life, bitch.
I know what you mean, it's just, the larger planet, (or both planets) pull towards EACHOTHER because they both have a gravitational pull on eachother! One simply doesn't move, waiting to get hit. It's perspectively judged. (If you're on one of the planets.
@The_Powder_Boy NOW do you understand?! if the planet is staying still and the photon is falling towards it. the planet is also moving towards the photon. the actions are one and the same.
you are standing on an asteroid. there are 2 planets moving towards each other. one is bigger than the other.
you are standing on a planet. there is a much smaller planet falling down from above you. using your telescope, you can see someone standing on the smaller planet and looking down at you. from where you're standing. it's obvious you are staying still and the smaller planet is falling towards you.
sentinal-5: Or, vise versa. (Correct my grammar if I'm wrong.)
The_Powder_Boy: That is what I think. And I'm really impressed that we are talking about logical, meaningful, topics. It makes me happy... Somehow...
ok. allow me to simplify. you are standing on a planet. there is a much bigger planet falling down from above you. from where you're standing, it's obvious you are staying still and the other planet is falling towards you.
Lol. +1 just because for once someone else pointed this out.
In your first comment, it does not matter if the object falling has mass or not. It matters if the object itf falling towards does.