Atomic10
Atomic10
122 / 41
13th Aug 2014
13th Sep 2014
Since nobody reads these things, just look at the explanation in the actual simulation. And please POLITELY correct me if I'm wrong, okay. I'm only 12 years old.
aaaaaaaaaaahhhhh forsciense imscienstist realistictpt speedoflight phot stne logic timetravel press7please

Comments

  • spazguy
    spazguy
    19th Aug 2014
    uh, blooberman? it takes 8 minutes and twenty seconds....
  • kamil2001studio
    kamil2001studio
    19th Aug 2014
    the mass of the kinetic energy in 1gram at the speed of light is enough to create gravity that slows time , (and creates a black hole)
  • kamil2001studio
    kamil2001studio
    19th Aug 2014
    time and physics of this world are about 100 times faster than light (universe expanding speed)
  • blooberman
    blooberman
    19th Aug 2014
    And light is not faster than time itself if it was then the light from the sun takes a couple million year for it to reach earth, if it was faster, then it would only take a couple thousand years. and powder toy isnt supposed to be the most realistic simulator for falling particles.
  • blooberman
    blooberman
    19th Aug 2014
    @Atomic10, what im trying to point out is, you most likely looked up the speed it takes for light to travel. I said that because theres no way that a 12 year old could instantly come up with the speed of accelerating protons(light particals).
  • Atomic10
    Atomic10
    19th Aug 2014
    J0n3s4: Okay. XD
  • J0n3s4
    J0n3s4
    19th Aug 2014
    i didnt see the stone left XD
  • Atomic10
    Atomic10
    19th Aug 2014
    J0n3s4: ???
  • J0n3s4
    J0n3s4
    19th Aug 2014
    it is phot and not stone asshole
  • Ferne
    Ferne
    19th Aug 2014
    @Spyrocool if such experiment was performed in real world, that would be true, however in TPT you can clearly see that it's moving over 3x faster than light. @Daniel219 If it was so, then it would have to gravitionally attract other objects with a noticable force, which it does not.