Atomic10
Atomic10
122 / 41
13th Aug 2014
13th Sep 2014
Since nobody reads these things, just look at the explanation in the actual simulation. And please POLITELY correct me if I'm wrong, okay. I'm only 12 years old.
aaaaaaaaaaahhhhh forsciense imscienstist realistictpt speedoflight phot stne logic timetravel press7please

Comments

  • blooberman
    blooberman
    14th Aug 2014
    why is this on front page poweder toy is not the most realistic simulator and you just looked this up on the internet but im giving you credit for your age and estimates...
  • kyledudey
    kyledudey
    14th Aug 2014
    wow 2000 more views over 13 hrs
  • kyledudey
    kyledudey
    14th Aug 2014
    its mostly bcus i had a conversation with atomic and suntinal-5 and all this gravity and star derp and star words nonsense darthghostbuster
  • DarthGhostbuster
    DarthGhostbuster
    14th Aug 2014
    WOW, this save has 28 pages of comments.
  • kyledudey
    kyledudey
    14th Aug 2014
    weel, of course uranium falls faster it is a heavier particle
  • Benthe1st
    Benthe1st
    14th Aug 2014
    URANIUM FALLS FASTER THAN THE STONE!!!
  • cooldud655
    cooldud655
    14th Aug 2014
    But what about when we speed up photons. Do we increse the speed of light or simply... Nope. Now my head hurts.
  • MikeBest
    MikeBest
    14th Aug 2014
    I have to say, movement is completly relative. Thus, taking the stone as refrence, it is not actually going down faster than light, but the light is going up while the stone is staying in the same place. These being said, no laws of phisics were broken.
  • MexLP
    MexLP
    14th Aug 2014
    but good job
  • MexLP
    MexLP
    14th Aug 2014
    thats right bu t the photon isnt on tem max. mph. you can make the faster with an bhol orbit or an whol (negativ and positv power) ;D tpt is so slow how jou need not chemical ;D