Atomic10
Atomic10
122 / 41
13th Aug 2014
13th Sep 2014
Since nobody reads these things, just look at the explanation in the actual simulation. And please POLITELY correct me if I'm wrong, okay. I'm only 12 years old.
aaaaaaaaaaahhhhh forsciense imscienstist realistictpt speedoflight phot stne logic timetravel press7please

Comments

  • jmpuchito
    jmpuchito
    14th Aug 2014
    so STNE breaks laws of phisics!!!!!!!!!
  • sandstorm
    sandstorm
    14th Aug 2014
    i dont know if "time traveling" is the best descriptor, it just experiences the same time, but slower.
  • jordanedwardriddle
    jordanedwardriddle
    14th Aug 2014
    good job im 11
  • Atomic10
    Atomic10
    14th Aug 2014
    blooberman: Nope, not the case, how would you tell I looked this up? What is your point?
  • asthepanda3
    asthepanda3
    14th Aug 2014
    Again-if something travels at the speed of light (that isn't light) it will turn into a ball of pure energy (plasma) then disappear, and again-anything with mass has gravity. (i agree that TPT isn't a good place to represent this, but it's nice that you tried)
  • robogeek537
    robogeek537
    14th Aug 2014
    I remember that the last time something like this got out of hands in the comments was about Earth's magnetic field that pissed off some science people (like me!). Even the mods said something about it.
  • MatthewY
    MatthewY
    14th Aug 2014
    btw im 13
  • MatthewY
    MatthewY
    14th Aug 2014
    correct +1 lol
  • MatthewY
    MatthewY
    14th Aug 2014
    the infinite particle of 13 traveling at 12343426.9048 mph/16trillion means that the subatomic squared mass is 1500
  • Miauw
    Miauw
    14th Aug 2014
    Somewhat belated, sentinal-5, but it takes an infinite amount of energy to accelerate anything with any amount of mass to c. Therefore photons cannot have mass. If photons have mass, waves of energy have mass too, since they are the same.