Atomic10
Atomic10
122 / 41
13th Aug 2014
13th Sep 2014
Since nobody reads these things, just look at the explanation in the actual simulation. And please POLITELY correct me if I'm wrong, okay. I'm only 12 years old.
aaaaaaaaaaahhhhh forsciense imscienstist realistictpt speedoflight phot stne logic timetravel press7please

Comments

  • Ryymus
    Ryymus
    16th Aug 2014
    Sry double post it was a problem
  • Ryymus
    Ryymus
    16th Aug 2014
    @tothemyers no u don't get it time travelling is going through time in an unatural form
  • Ryymus
    Ryymus
    16th Aug 2014
    @tothemyers no u don't get it time travelling is going through time in an unatural form
  • tothemyers
    tothemyers
    16th Aug 2014
    OK, this "time traveling" (spelling?) is bugging me, so can I set it to rest once and for all? YOU ARE ALL TIME TRAVELERS! There, I said it! Why are we time travelers? Because we continually move into the future, never staying put in one place in time! (although sometimes I think some are stuck in the past)
  • sentinal-5
    sentinal-5
    16th Aug 2014
    pro tip: never say you're smarter than somebody. even if you know you are. it just makes you look like a douche. ;)
  • BigTardis
    BigTardis
    16th Aug 2014
    I erm 12 and we 12year olds can be smarter than some
  • TheBigMan
    TheBigMan
    16th Aug 2014
    im 11 and I have been trying to demonstrate special relativity on tpt for a while now. Good job!
  • sentinal-5
    sentinal-5
    16th Aug 2014
    i'm not sure if he is using the speed of light at sea-level. but i'm fairly sure google is using the speed of light in a vaccum and it says 670616629mph as opposed to the 670616624mph he says. there's not much difference.. but it's noteable.
  • wolfman
    wolfman
    16th Aug 2014
    im not making fun of you but either you got the mph off the internet or you are really really smart... im 19 and working with astro physics. Great job if you did no research
  • Atomic10
    Atomic10
    16th Aug 2014
    (Also 60+ Upvotes)