sentinal-5
sentinal-5
48 / 21
1st Feb 2014
1st Feb 2014
a slightly more energetic form or my rocket fuel.
ithinkitscool doesnotsuck layered solidfuel napalmlike

Comments

  • Schneumer
    Schneumer
    7th Feb 2014
    Wow you layered explosives. So fp worthy. 99999+++
  • spaceinvader
    spaceinvader
    6th Feb 2014
    :) lol
  • spaceinvader
    spaceinvader
    6th Feb 2014
    this sucks
  • sentinal-5
    sentinal-5
    4th Feb 2014
    wow.... thanks SO much for that ultra-helpfull criticism brian..... WHY does it suck? that way i can make it better next time...
  • 123brian123
    123brian123
    2nd Feb 2014
    this sucks
  • sentinal-5
    sentinal-5
    2nd Feb 2014
    oh, and the tnt also breaks the coal.. :3
  • sentinal-5
    sentinal-5
    2nd Feb 2014
    the tnt is there as a catalyst so the reaction is more energetic and the ignc is there as backup ignition incase the others go out (which they did during testing)
  • sentinal-5
    sentinal-5
    2nd Feb 2014
    @the_New_powder99999 i used all that coal because i wanted it to generate as much gas/pixel as possible, the coal breaks and each pixel of bcol gives off around 500 pixels of fire/smoke there are 2 layers of coal so that's 1000 pixels of gas for every one pixel of fuel... it gives off a LOT of thrust, it's just not contained so the pressure doesn't build, put it in a rocket and then tell me it isn't powerfull.
  • kingman
    kingman
    2nd Feb 2014
    WOOMPH!
  • the_new_powder99999
    the_new_powder99999
    1st Feb 2014
    A bit too much coal, not enough thrust to be useful. NITR and C-5 are good ways to produce thrust (instead of tnt) with a bit of coal to make it more efficient. +1