its not good enough................................................................ only joking awesome +1
haha loads of comments while i was typing that. also i probably got something wrong.
@robogeek537 1) put them in a hangar when your moving 2) turn the fighter slightly away from the opposite of the way its moving, power up engines. turn complete. 3) turn around and burn to cancel velocity 4) a guided missile wouldnt need much fuel in space and would have a lot more room for an explosive capable of doing damage to something in space. 5) speed itself cant harm a person, acceleration can. 6) That is why they have to be fast.
Its amusing that they're arguing about something we are DECADES away from.
is there really a arguement about THIS? interesting........
1) Acceleration is determined by thrust vs mass, so figthers, having low mass, can have decent acceleration. 2) Turning is just burning in another direction so that the final speed and direction are those desired. Small ships are easier to rotate, and therefore easier to turn. 3) The way to slow down is to burn in a direction opposite to that of your craft. Dockings have been done before. 4) a sizable HEAT or perhaps nuclear warhead would do the trick and a 2 or 3 man ship would be on par with the pilot workloads of modern fighters. A drone would also work. 5) There's no such thing as lethal speeds, only lethal accelerations. It's quite hard to reach unsustainable accelerations with thrusters, unless they are unreasonably powerful. 6) All spacecraft are vulnerable to EMP. Shielding is quite heavy. 7) It's very hard to get the materials into orbit for big ships, so an exclusively heavy fleet would be unreasonably expensive. A mix of big and small makes more sense.
appologies for the previous comment, it was to rebute the_new_powder99999's comment before