INST is faster than conductive wall.

  • HarmonicFarts
    25th Dec 2010 Member 0 Permalink
    With this test INST seems faster than conductive wall.
    So its faster than the "instantaneous" wall.

    Heres the test:

    LoadSaveBlock(91350);
  • Neospector
    25th Dec 2010 Member 0 Permalink
    Weird.
  • Candunc
    25th Dec 2010 Member 0 Permalink
    Cool
  • smjjames
    25th Dec 2010 Member 0 Permalink
    Interesting.

    I decided to tweak the test a little by making the INST the same length as the wall and it shows even better that it's faster than the wall. It's a couple frames faster but just a few frames difference significantly speeds it up.
  • jma1111
    25th Dec 2010 Member 0 Permalink
    Yes it is, even with those silicon gaps. Cool.
  • Bodgybuilder
    25th Dec 2010 Member 0 Permalink
    Wow, a better conductor than Conductive. What does INST stand for, anyway?
  • jma1111
    25th Dec 2010 Member 0 Permalink
    Instant.
  • HarmonicFarts
    25th Dec 2010 Member 0 Permalink
    Bodgybuilder:
    What does INST stand for, anyway?

    Fail.
  • jma1111
    25th Dec 2010 Member 0 Permalink
    HarmonicFarts
    Epic fail you mean...
  • Bodgybuilder
    25th Dec 2010 Member 0 Permalink
    Sorry, it's hard to convey sarcasm on the internet.