Coffee
Coffee
124 / 11
26th Mar 2017
26th Mar 2017
a test of using PROT to simulate a moving ship into the thick blue atmosphere of a large planet.
artwork nomanssky space star planet ship planets

Comments

  • NoNStopWarrior
    NoNStopWarrior
    18th Jan 2019
    Ship flying like in Windows98 screensaver :P (yea ima was using Win98 be4 it start glitch ;()
  • Dovydas
    Dovydas
    11th Apr 2017
    bEST ART IM EVER SEE AND THING 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999+
  • LetsGoToSpace
    LetsGoToSpace
    2nd Apr 2017
    Im still pretty sure Coffee is J.J Abrams' son.
  • TheNik
    TheNik
    2nd Apr 2017
    There are various other design considertions, for example if a ship is crewed and has a radiation source, like a nuclear reactor, you want to put it as far away from the crew as possible. So the reactor would be on one end and the crew on the other. This and other examples tend to lead to longer shapes for the ships.
  • TheNik
    TheNik
    2nd Apr 2017
    N0ble, danieldan0: Concepts for bigger modern or futuristic interplanetary or even interstellar spacecraft are all elongated and oriented along the direction of travel. First, that's because the engine acceleration stresses a long shape less than a wide shape, saving weight on structural reinforcements. And second, small debris particles can't be ignored. Not for drag, but for the impact damage. And a long shape reduces the risk of impact.
  • Ulrik54
    Ulrik54
    2nd Apr 2017
    The Last Jedi looks great
  • N0ble
    N0ble
    1st Apr 2017
    @danieldan0 But there's no drag in space.
  • danieldan0
    danieldan0
    1st Apr 2017
    noice! but this is bad shape for ship, i think. it would be pretty slow, if it uses modern rocket engine (made by humans).
  • rememberme
    rememberme
    30th Mar 2017
    You make lens flare really weard... +1
  • cats15
    cats15
    30th Mar 2017
    Coffee you can make a "space junction" next if your interested in prot :) :p