It relatively warm and bright surface must indicate that this comet is close to its host star, right?
@Tasha04 Well, then it's not my fault either, that i do not acknowledge your nasty attitude specifically towards my art, I do however understand that you don't like me for some reason, but no need for all this drama, unlike you, I don't try to f*ck around, just because something doesn't "comfort" me. Also, thanks @Mrprocom.
Nean: its not my fault i dont like VIP84s "DECO" art
2 mods, wow. Jesus christ what do you people have against art?
Going back to @TheNik's comments, Given that both the surface of the asteroid and the galaxy appear FAR brighter and more saturated than they would to a human eye, could we not conclude that this image was captured by a space probe with a long exposure, and the photograph was digitally altered to produce exaggerated saturation gradients? (i.e. it's a photo released for PR by the space agency operating the probe)
un-pause this for "night time"
Tasha04: Also, if you report a save for being art again you may be banned. It clearly states this when reporting, "2) Do not ask for saves to be removed from front page unless they break the rules.". Reporting this save 4 times is extremely excessive and wastes our time.
Also no need to report deco art on front page, mods are aware that those exist. Anyway, cool art save, +1 :)
I used to demote art saves from the front page when they reached a certain number of upvotes (50 for example), but then some art saves got so many upvotes that they exceeded that number within a short period of time, so I thought it was unfair to demote them early. Mods mostly demote art saves from the front page when there are too many of them there, currently there are only four, so that's fine.