TheNik
TheNik
92 / 13
22nd Jan 2017
22nd Jan 2017
The VRSG fuel lasts as long as COAL, but burns > 59% hotter, meaning it generates that much more energy, and thus making it that much more efficient than COAL. The only major drawback is that handling VRSG is extremely difficult and dangerous. Enjoy!
fire efficient science fuel efficiency comparison virus coal burn compare

Comments

  • armoryshop
    armoryshop
    24th Jan 2017
    man you created a meme on TPT! I don't believe this is going to be very known upon the TPT community, but if it does, cheers, you'll be known for creating the "VRSG is an Efficient Fuel!" id:2094666
  • flut10
    flut10
    24th Jan 2017
    forgot i had command in to destroy diamond and destroy coal faster and the whole thing was gone within 5-10 seconds ;p
  • TheNik
    TheNik
    23rd Jan 2017
    Bonus points if someone manages to build a reactor powreed by VRSG from mostly destructible particles. (E.g. some DTEC won't harm, but not all from DMND, you get the point.)
  • TheNik
    TheNik
    23rd Jan 2017
    jf55: This was posted here once before, also please check the comments in the save you linked. There's a clear explanation why the arguments are invalid, at least in this case.
  • TheNik
    TheNik
    23rd Jan 2017
    22minnis22: As the whole point of this save is the idea, and it was already posted before, some might claim the idea theirs, and be right about it. I prefer to get that straight before it even has a chance of becoming a conflict, if possible. But thanks for the support!
  • jf55
    jf55
    23rd Jan 2017
    the truth id:2094231
  • 22minnis22
    22minnis22
    23rd Jan 2017
    @TheNik, You don't have to take it down unless it is an exact copy. If an idea could only be posted once, there would be a lot less saves on TPT!
  • TheNik
    TheNik
    23rd Jan 2017
    manhong2112: I see, that proves your claim. Again, if you wish, I may either make this save private or take it down at all.
  • TheNik
    TheNik
    23rd Jan 2017
    SlazZer: I never claimed it to be either easy to handle or have a high specific impulse in certain rocket drives - the latter of which still can't be found out definitely, as the specific impulse is a very... well, specific number.
  • TheNik
    TheNik
    23rd Jan 2017
    eden1115: I am not sure what you mean, but if I understood correctly, then you just described the problem I already mentioned in the description.